Classifica LLM

La classifica
definitiva degli LLM

Confronta 25+ modelli linguistici su 10 benchmark. Classifiche, prezzi, velocità e ragionamento — tutto in un unico posto.

Vedi la classifica Metodologia

GPT-4oGPT-4o Minio3o4-miniClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.0 FlashLlama 3.1 405BLlama 3.1 70BLlama 3.3 70BLlama 4 MaverickMistral LargeMixtral 8x22BDeepSeek V3DeepSeek R1Qwen 2.5 72BQwen 3 235BCommand R+Grok 2Grok 3Phi-4GPT-4oGPT-4o Minio3o4-miniClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.0 FlashLlama 3.1 405BLlama 3.1 70BLlama 3.3 70BLlama 4 MaverickMistral LargeMixtral 8x22BDeepSeek V3DeepSeek R1Qwen 2.5 72BQwen 3 235BCommand R+Grok 2Grok 3Phi-4

25+

Modelli tracciati

Benchmark

25+

Provider

Settimanale

Aggiornamento dati

Modelli top

Vedi tutti →

#	Modello	Punteggio globale	ELO	MMLU	SWE-Bench	Velocità
1	Claude Opus 4 Anthropic	97.8	1385	92.1%	72.5%	45 t/s
2	Gemini 2.5 Pro Google	97.5	1398	92%	63.8%	85 t/s
3	o3 OpenAI	97.1	1380	91.2%	71.7%	58 t/s
4	DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek	92.3	1358	90.8%	49.2%	32 t/s
5	o4-mini OpenAI	91.5	1345	88.3%	68.1%	145 t/s
6	Claude Sonnet 4 Anthropic	90.3	1340	90.4%	62.3%	79 t/s
7	GPT-4o OpenAI	89.2	1287	88.7%	38.4%	110 t/s
8	Grok 3 xAI	88.8	1330	89.2%	55.2%	55 t/s
9	Claude 3.5 Sonnet Anthropic	88.4	1272	88.7%	49%	82 t/s
10	Llama 4 Maverick Meta	87.5	1325	89.5%	47.5%	120 t/s