Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10vsHunyuan Vision 1.5 Thinking
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads the overall Podium Score by 1.0 points (71.0 vs 70.0).Category wins: Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 0 — 0 Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Thinking.Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 71.0 (vs 70.0 for Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Thinking). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 ($3/M/M)
| Metric | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 71.0 ▲ | 70.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $3/M | $3/M |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Amazon Nova 26 02 10 vs Claude Mythos · Amazon Nova 26 02 10 vs Claude Fable 5 · Amazon Nova 26 02 10 vs Kimi K3 · Amazon Nova 26 02 10 vs Claude Opus 5