Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32kvsHunyuan T1 20250711
Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k leads the overall Podium Score by 5.0 points (74.0 vs 69.0).Category wins: Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k 0 — 0 Hunyuan T1 20250711.Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 74.0 (vs 69.0 for Hunyuan T1 20250711). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Hunyuan T1 20250711 ($3/M/M)
| Metric | Claude Opus 4 5 20251101 Thinking 32k | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 74.0 ▲ | 69.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $15/M | $3/M ▲ |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Claude Mythos · Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Claude Fable 5 · Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Kimi K3 · Claude Opus 4 5 32k vs Claude Opus 5