Deepseek V3.2 Exp ThinkingvsLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1
Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking leads the overall Podium Score by 4.0 points (71.0 vs 67.0).Category wins: Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking 0 — 0 Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1.Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1 is the cheaper pick ($0/M vs $1.1/M per 1M output tokens). Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 71.0 (vs 67.0 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1 ($0/M/M)
| Metric | Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1 |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 71.0 ▲ | 67.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $1.1/M | $0/M ▲ |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Deepseek V3.2 Exp T vs Claude Mythos · Deepseek V3.2 Exp T vs Claude Fable 5 · Deepseek V3.2 Exp T vs Kimi K3 · Deepseek V3.2 Exp T vs Claude Opus 5