Deepseek V3.2 ThinkingvsSeed Oss 36b Instruct
Deepseek V3.2 Thinking leads the overall Podium Score by 52.5 points (71.0 vs 18.5).Category wins: Deepseek V3.2 Thinking 0 — 0 Seed Oss 36b Instruct.Deepseek V3.2 Thinking is the cheaper pick ($1.1/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). Seed Oss 36b Instruct is faster (60 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Deepseek V3.2 Thinking is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 71.0 (vs 18.5 for Seed Oss 36b Instruct). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Seed Oss 36b Instruct (60 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Deepseek V3.2 Thinking ($1.1/M/M)
| Metric | Deepseek V3.2 Thinking | Seed Oss 36b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 71.0 ▲ | 18.5 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | 40.0 |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | 35.0 |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | 45.0 |
| Multimodal | — | 30.0 |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 60 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $1.1/M ▲ | $3/M |
| Context window | 128K | 131K ▲ |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Deepseek V3.2 T vs Claude Mythos · Deepseek V3.2 T vs Claude Fable 5 · Deepseek V3.2 T vs Kimi K3 · Deepseek V3.2 T vs Claude Opus 5