Glm 4.7vsClaude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k
Glm 4.7 leads the overall Podium Score by 1.0 points (72.0 vs 71.0).Category wins: Glm 4.7 0 — 0 Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k.Glm 4.7 is the cheaper pick ($3/M vs $15/M per 1M output tokens). Glm 4.7 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Glm 4.7 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 72.0 (vs 71.0 for Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Glm 4.7 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Glm 4.7 ($3/M/M)
| Metric | Glm 4.7 | Claude Opus 4 20250514 Thinking 16k |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 72.0 ▲ | 71.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $3/M ▲ | $15/M |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Glm 4.7 vs Claude Mythos · Glm 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5 · Glm 4.7 vs Kimi K3 · Glm 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5