Minimax M2.5vsLlama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16
Minimax M2.5 leads the overall Podium Score by 3.0 points (70.0 vs 67.0).Category wins: Minimax M2.5 0 — 0 Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16.Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16 is the cheaper pick ($0/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). Minimax M2.5 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Minimax M2.5 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 70.0 (vs 67.0 for Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Minimax M2.5 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16 ($0/M/M)
| Metric | Minimax M2.5 | Llama 3.1 405b Instruct Bf16 |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 70.0 ▲ | 67.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $3/M | $0/M ▲ |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Minimax M2.5 vs Claude Mythos · Minimax M2.5 vs Claude Fable 5 · Minimax M2.5 vs Kimi K3 · Minimax M2.5 vs Claude Opus 5