O3 2025 04 16vsDeepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking
O3 2025 04 16 leads the overall Podium Score by 1.0 points (72.0 vs 71.0).Category wins: O3 2025 04 16 0 — 0 Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking.Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking is the cheaper pick ($1.1/M vs $10/M per 1M output tokens). O3 2025 04 16 is faster (50 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
O3 2025 04 16 is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 72.0 (vs 71.0 for Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
O3 2025 04 16 (50 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking ($1.1/M/M)
| Metric | O3 2025 04 16 | Deepseek V3.2 Exp Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 72.0 ▲ | 71.0 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | — |
| Multimodal | — | — |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 50 t/s |
| Output price | $10/M | $1.1/M ▲ |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: O3 04 16 vs Claude Mythos · O3 04 16 vs Claude Fable 5 · O3 04 16 vs Kimi K3 · O3 04 16 vs Claude Opus 5