Qwen3.5 397b A17bvsSeed Oss 36b Instruct
Qwen3.5 397b A17b leads the overall Podium Score by 53.5 points (72.0 vs 18.5).Category wins: Qwen3.5 397b A17b 0 — 0 Seed Oss 36b Instruct.Qwen3.5 397b A17b is the cheaper pick ($2/M vs $3/M per 1M output tokens). Seed Oss 36b Instruct is faster (60 t/s vs 50 t/s).
Key VerdictAggregated 2026 Benchmark Analysis
Qwen3.5 397b A17b is rated higher overall with a Podium Score of 72.0 (vs 18.5 for Seed Oss 36b Instruct). Both models show closely matched capabilities across domain benchmarks.
Coding & Engineering
Comparable
Inference Speed
Seed Oss 36b Instruct (60 t/s)
Cost Efficiency
Qwen3.5 397b A17b ($2/M/M)
| Metric | Qwen3.5 397b A17b | Seed Oss 36b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Podium Score | 72.0 ▲ | 18.5 |
| Arena Elo | — | — |
| Intelligence Index | — | — |
| Coding | — | 40.0 |
| Math | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | 35.0 |
| Agentic | — | — |
| Knowledge | — | 45.0 |
| Multimodal | — | 30.0 |
| Long-context | — | — |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 60 t/s ▲ |
| Output price | $2/M ▲ | $3/M |
| Context window | 128K | 131K ▲ |
Scores aggregated from five independent leaderboards. See Methodology. More head-to-heads: Qwen3.5 397b A17b vs Claude Mythos · Qwen3.5 397b A17b vs Claude Fable 5 · Qwen3.5 397b A17b vs Kimi K3 · Qwen3.5 397b A17b vs Claude Opus 5